Validity and Reliability of the Novel Indonesian Instrument for Aphasia Diagnosis (IDEA)

Aphasia diagnosis in Indonesia remains challenging due to limited culturally and linguistically appropriate instruments. Widely used tools such as the Boston Diagnostic Aphasia Examination (BDAE) and Western Aphasia Battery (WAB) are not adapted to the Indonesian context, while Tes Afasia untuk Diagnosis, Informasi, dan Rehabilitasi (TADIR) provides screening but lacks diagnostic accuracy. To address this gap, we developed the Instrumen Diagnosis dan Evaluasi Afasia (IDEA) for native Indonesian speakers and evaluated its validity, reliability, and normative cutoff values in cognitively healthy Indonesian adults. Eighty-three cognitively normal adults (screened using MoCA-Ina) with no history of neurological disease were assessed using IDEA, which evaluates six language domains. Items were adapted from existing tools and reviewed by experts. Content validity, internal consistency (Cronbachs alpha), and construct validity (Exploratory Factor Analysis) were analyzed using SPSS v25. A total of 83 participants were included (median age = 55.81 years, 54% secondary education). IDEA demonstrated good feasibility, with an average completion time of 45-60 minutes depending on participant engagement. Content validity was established by unanimous expert consensus. Construct validity showed meritorious sampling adequacy (KMO = .872) and significant sphericity (Bartletts test {chi}^2 (15) = 278.523, p<.001), supporting factor analysis. Internal consistency showed good reliability across six domains (Cronbachs = 0.896). IDEA is a valid and reliable tool for assessing aphasia in Indonesian natives. It is a culturally appropriate assessment tool which offers structured, domain-based evaluation and supports differential diagnosis of both classical and progressive aphasia syndromes. Keywords: Aphasia, Language Assessment, Indonesian, IDEA, Validity