Biological Continued Pretraining Reshapes the Capability Profile of a Foundation Model Without Catastrophic Forgetting

It is widely assumed that continued pretraining (CPT) on a narrow, out-of-distribution corpus such as raw biological sequence must trade away a general-purpose model's broad competence --- the "alignment tax" or catastrophic-forgetting intuition. We test this directly, without any new training, by re-analyzing three checkpoints from a single lineage of a 26B-parameter Mixture-of-Experts model (Gemma-4-26B-A4B): the instruction-tuned base, the same model after biological CPT (8.7B tokens of DNA, protein, and biomedical text), and after subsequent supervised fine-tuning (SFT). Across three independent capability axes --- general knowledge/reasoning (MMLU, ARC, HellaSwag), code generation (MBPP), and biomedical knowledge (BixBench) --- we find that biological CPT does not degrade the model; it lifts it: MMLU +13 points, MBPP pass@1 nearly doubles (0.33 to 0.63), and BixBench discrimination rises sharply (MCC 0.23 to 0.92). The single measured regression is truthfulness (TruthfulQA -8.8 points), a small and interpretable domain drift. A clean vocabulary-expansion ablation (<0.4 pt on every general metric) confirms the gains are attributable to CPT, not tokenizer changes. Crucially, subsequent SFT narrows the model back: all three axes fall to near-base levels, revealing a consistent division of labor --- CPT re-organizes and lifts the shared capability substrate; SFT cashes it out onto target tasks. We argue this reframes biological sequence not as a competitor for a foundation model's capacity but as a form of structured scientific data that reshapes its capability profile, and that CPT and SFT should be budgeted as complementary rather than substitutable stages. All checkpoints, evaluation code, and per-example outputs are public.