Toward precision rehabilitation in adolescent mild traumatic brain injury: leveraging physiologic data from commercially available smartwatches to identify patient subgroups

Autonomic dysfunction is a common sequela of mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI). Physical activity progression is an integral component of mTBI rehabilitation, particularly in addressing autonomic dysfunction. However, clinicians often rely on point-in-time evaluation of orthostatic and exercise intolerance to guide activity recommendations. Commercially available wearable devices (e.g., Fitbits) provide an opportunity to evaluate heart rate response to activity in a real-world setting. Previous work has used physiologic (heart rate) and activity (step count) data to identify subgroups of adults with stroke that may be used to guide activity recommendations. This method may be useful to subgroup youth post-mTBI to identify those who have abnormal physiologic responses to activity. We aimed to identify subgroups using heart rate and step count data in adolescents presenting for specialty care after diagnosed mTBI. Eighty participants aged 13-18 within six months of mTBI diagnosis were recruited to wear a Fitbit Sense 2. Data from seven days and two nights collected within fourteen days of enrollment were included. A group-based steps per minute (SPM) threshold (25th percentile; 10 SPM) and individualized heart rate threshold (20% heart rate reserve (HRR)) were used to classify each minute of active daytime data into one of four quadrants: SPM>10 & HRR>20% (QI), SPM<10 & HRR>20% (QII), SPM<10 & HRR<20% (QIII), and SPM>10 & HRR<20% (QIV). We used percentage of minutes in each quadrant, mean steps per day, percentage of minutes with zero steps, mean SPM in QI, and resting heart rate in a k-means clustering algorithm to identify subgroups. We evaluated subgroup differences by clustering variables using Kruskal-Wallis tests. Sixty-one participants were included. Three subgroups emerged: Sedentary (n=12), Active (n=23), and Atypically Elevated Heart Rate (AEHR; n=26). Subgroups varied significantly on all clustering variables (p<0.01). The Active subgroup took a high number of steps per day, had lower sedentary time, and had the highest activity intensity (mean SPM in QI). The Sedentary subgroup took fewer steps per day compared to the Active subgroup, had high sedentary time, and showed the highest resting heart rate. The AEHR subgroup took fewer steps per day compared to the Active subgroup and had high sedentary time. The AEHR subgroup also spent a higher percentage of time with an atypically high heart rate response to low levels of activity compared to the other subgroups. Our findings suggest that data from wearable devices can identify subgroups of adolescents with mTBI with distinct physiologic/physical activity profiles, which may ultimately be used to inform personalized activity prescriptions. Future work should aim to understand how the identified subgroups relate to longitudinal outcomes.