Data-Centric Evaluation of Protein Function Prediction Pipelines

Performance estimates in protein function prediction depend not only on model choice but also on upstream decisions that define the learning problem. Using antioxidant protein classification as a controlled case study, we evaluated how dataset harmonisation, protein representation, redundancy control, and partitioning strategy affect protein machine learning pipelines. We integrated 18,804 records from 12 publicly available dataset entries into a curated consensus dataset of 4,193 protein sequences. One-hot encoding and six pretrained protein language model representations were evaluated as model inputs and as similarity spaces for redundancy reduction and distance-aware splitting. Representation choice substantially altered dataset geometry, retained dataset size, class balance, and downstream evaluation. At representation-specific p90 thresholds, one-hot encoding retained the complete dataset, whereas pretrained embeddings retained between 5% and 25% of sequences. Distance-aware partitioning reduced apparent performance relative to random splitting by up to 0.15 MCC before redundancy control, while this difference narrowed after similarity filtering. Selected configurations nevertheless maintained high performance under stricter evaluation, reaching an MCC of 0.84. These findings show that performance estimates should be interpreted as outcomes of complete data-centric workflows rather than isolated properties of predictive models.