AI News Archive: July 17, 2026 — Part 8
Sourced from 500+ daily AI sources, scored by relevance.
- Using Classical ML to Empower AI Agents
On the value of building on existing foundations The post Using Classical ML to Empower AI Agents appeared first on Towards Data Science .
- Xi’s call on AI, Trump blasts China, US tariffs
Chinese President Xi Jinping stressed the dual nature of artificial intelligence’s opportunities and challenges, calling for a principle of “openness” and regulations to keep the technology “secure and controllable” in a speech at the country’s flagship annual AI conference. Xi’s first speech to the World AI Conference (WAIC) in Shanghai showed AI is a national strategic priority as China seeks to build greater technological self-reliance amid its tech rivalry with the United States. Earlier...
- Small Texas Town Joins Group Considering Data Center Ban
Leaders in Lockhart, 30 miles south of Austin, have directed staff to develop strict standards for data center development rather than an outright ban that could expose the city to legal challenges.
Score: 35🌐 MovesJul 17, 2026https://www.govtech.com/artificial-intelligence/small-texas-town-joins-group-considering-data-center-ban - How Korean stocks turned from trusty bellwether to AI frenzy
How Korean stocks turned from trusty bellwether to AI frenzy Reuters
Score: 34🌐 MovesJul 17, 2026https://www.reuters.com/world/asia-pacific/how-korean-stocks-turned-trusty-bellwether-ai-frenzy-2026-07-17/ - Dreame’s technology strategy could compound its advantage in physical AI
The capabilities it develops for one product can often be adapted across categories.
Score: 34🌐 MovesJul 17, 2026https://kr-asia.com/dreames-technology-strategy-could-compound-its-advantage-in-physical-ai - AI makes its case against the ‘business-savvy CIO’
Once upon a time, there were actual arguments as to whether CIOs should be business people, not technology people. With any luck, these arguments were stomped out back here: “ The case against the ‘business-savvy CIO’ ” — which drove the arguments for this false dichotomy into the ground back in 2018. Some complications have arisen in the near decade since, so I’m afraid we need to revisit the subject — especially as the most recent of this has made the drumbeat for business-savvy CIOs that much louder. One source of this need was the case of the dreaded Digital adjectival abuse, also known as “Digital as a Noun.” Digital was a big deal back in the pre-COVID era. It matters here because for Digital to work, business leaders needed to be technologists, not just business people. As business leaders became better technologists, CIOs needed to keep up on the business potential for the various Digital technologies their business leader friends were suddenly asking for. Another source of confusion was COVID itself, and the discovery it led to on the part of those business executives not already convinced that the entire business ran on IT, and that any area that still relied on manual processes should be presumed incompetent. Rather than insisting on a full-blown ROI to justify automating a function, those relying on manual methods were (or should have been) asked to justify this choice. AI changes the equation But as tendentious or tectonic as those shifts might have seemed at the time, AI is raising the now-what-do-I-do? equation to new heights. That’s because CIOs are now being given a new set of alternatives: Whether they want to be business people after all; Whether they should become or remain classical business/technologists; Or, should they set their sights on becoming AI business/technologists. You might have noticed an emerging trend in IT: The proliferation of articles about AI whose content even many tech-savvy CIOs can’t make heads or tails of. And no, the problem isn’t that their texts include a bunch of unfamiliar buzzwords . Much of the offending content is rooted in unfamiliar concepts, not vocabulary changes. Or, even more frustrating, the puzzlement sometimes lies in familiar buzzwords whose meaning has changed and become obscure. So never mind whether CIOs should be business people or technologists. A more challenging question is whether CIOs should be business people, classically tech-savvy people, or AI/tech-savvy people. Or some combination of those alternatives. But wait, there’s a whole other level we need to dig through. That’s because this collection of confusing questions isn’t the starting point. It’s because, as CIO, the questions that matter aren’t about how the CIO engages with the rest of the company as an executive. It’s how the CIO engages as the company’s highest-level business analyst . The CIO’s changing roles and directives With classical IT organizational architectures, a CIO could make sense of all of IT’s slices, dices, and levels, how the pieces fit together to make the business more effective, and how adding and rearranging the pieces could help make the business more effective and competitive. In the good ol’ days, that is, CIOs could succeed wearing their business analyst haberdashery without having to give up their executive function. Read the average opinion piece on how AI affects the CIO’s role and you’ll get the same tired back-office-to-front-office recommendations we waded through when Digital was king. But AI isn’t what’s driving that shift, if it even is a shift. No, here’s what I think the average CIO is in for: Elevating the business analyst: CIOs need to be smart about AI, but aren’t in a position to make themselves business-analyst-smart about AI. So it’s up to the CIO to give IT’s best business analysts assignments that will make them AI- smart, and to schedule regular debriefings to help the CIO become smart enough. Become architect-level smart about AI: CIOs should build a capability-level view of AI , collaborating with the whole IT department to gain a realistic understanding of what high-level business capabilities AI does and could bring to the business party. Adopt the CSO hat on the company’s behalf: No, notchief security officer. Chief skepticism officer: What the company needs the CIO to become is someone able to see through the hype and blather that sets implementation traps and leads to seductive but unachievable transformation programs. Why this matters more than you might think Once upon a time, one of the hallmarks of well-built IT was simplicity. IT professionals designed and engineered systems they and their colleagues could understand because the systems were designed to be graspable. Among the many changes AI is bringing to the fore is that AIs don’t need the same level of simplicity, and we can anticipate that AIs won’t be instructed to make their designs human-graspable either. We already have too many applications in the IT portfolio that are the only repositories of business logic the company has — the developers and business analysts who supported this business logic retired long ago. That was the case when simplicity was a design goal. Just imagine the scenario when AIs build systems for which simplicity isn’t a target they’re aiming for at all. See also: AI is reducing leadership to simply managing work Can an AI be a competent leader? Let’s find out AI is about to get really weird. CIOs better be prepared.
Score: 34🌐 MovesJul 17, 2026https://www.cio.com/article/4195254/ai-makes-its-case-against-the-business-savvy-cio.html - Why technology leaders are losing the AI conversation to the people who report to them
I keep seeing a version of the same scene. A CEO has a question about AI. It is a real question, the kind that will shape where the company spends the next two years. The CEO does not bring it to the CIO. They bring it to a data leader two levels down, or to a vendor who presented at a conference, or to an AI specialist a board member recommended. The CIO finds out the strategy is forming when a slide shows up that they did not build. By then, the direction is already half-set, and the CIO is being asked to react to it rather than shape it. I want to be precise about what is happening, because it is easy to misread. The CIO has not been removed from anything. Title intact, budget intact, seat at the table intact. What has changed is quieter. On one of the most consequential technology conversations the company will have this decade, the CIO is being routed around. The work still flows through them eventually. The thinking no longer starts with them. I have watched this happen to capable people who would have given the CEO a better answer than the person who was asked. That is what makes it worth naming. This is not a competence gap. It is a positioning gap, and positioning gaps close in the wrong direction if you ignore them long enough. How the routing actually starts The routing does not begin with a decision to exclude anyone. It begins with a CEO who is anxious about AI and looking for someone who sounds certain. AI is moving fast enough that executives feel the pressure to have a point of view before they have earned one. That pressure usually arrives secondhand, from a board member or a peer on the golf course describing what is working at their company. So the CEO goes looking for someone who will confirm the answer they already want to hear, and they keep going back to whoever gives it to them. Here is where many technology leaders lose the thread. For years, the safe posture in the CIO seat was measured caution. You raised the risks, you flagged the integration cost, you asked who owns the data and what the compliance exposure looks like. That posture built credibility in an era when the failure mode was moving too fast on technology nobody understood. With AI, the same posture reads as drag. A CEO who is being told by three vendors that “the future is already here” does not want to hear why they should slow down and be cautious. They hear caution as losing the race, and they go find a point of view somewhere else. The data leaders, vendors and specialists who get the call are not necessarily more capable. They are more available with a confident answer. A vendor’s whole job is to arrive with conviction. A data scientist who has shipped one impressive model carries more apparent authority on AI, in that moment, than a CIO who runs the entire estate but talks about AI the way they talk about every other risk. The CEO is not weighing depth against depth. They are weighing the person who said yes against the person who said it depends. Once that pattern sets, it compounds. The CEO who got a satisfying answer from the data leader goes back to the data leader. The vendor who shaped the first conversation gets invited into the second. Each loop the CIO is not in makes the next one easier to run without them. The org chart still says the CIO owns technology strategy. The actual conversation has relocated. What it costs before anyone notices The cost shows up late, which is exactly why it is dangerous. For a while nothing looks broken. The CIO is still delivering. The AI initiatives are still landing on their plate to execute. The damage is happening upstream, in the room where the bets get made, and the CIO is not in that room. I have seen what arrives downstream when the strategy was set without the person who has to run it. A model gets championed that the data cannot actually support. A vendor commitment gets made that locks the company into an architecture the CIO would have flagged in the first meeting. An agent gets deployed inside a business unit, with executive blessing, and the CIO inherits accountability for it months later without ever having shaped how it was governed. The recent IBM finding that CIOs are increasingly held accountable for AI they do not fully control is the visible end of this. The invisible front end is the conversation the CIO was routed around, the one where the accountability got created in the first place. What I find most corrosive is what it does to the CIO’s standing over time. Every initiative the CIO executes but did not shape reinforces a story about what the CIO is for. They become the person who runs the technology other people decided on. That is a fine description of an order taker and a poor description of a strategic leader, and CEOs do not promote, fund, or defend order takers when budgets tighten. The routing-around does not just cost the company a worse AI strategy. It quietly recasts the CIO as the implementer of everyone else’s thinking, and that recasting is hard to reverse once the executive team has internalized it. What the leaders who stayed in the conversation did The technology leaders I have watched hold their position on AI did one thing first. They stopped leading with caution and started leading with a point of view. Not a reckless one. A real, defensible position on where AI creates value in their specific business and where it does not, delivered with the same conviction the vendors bring, before the CEO went looking elsewhere for it. They made themselves the person with the clearest answer, which is the role the routing-around was filling with someone else. That requires giving up a posture that felt safe for a long time. The CIOs who made the shift accepted that on AI, being right and cautious is worth less than being early and directional. They formed a view ahead of being asked. They walked into the CEO’s office with where we should place our AI bets and why, rather than waiting to be handed someone else’s bets to pressure-test. The difference is whether you are the author of the strategy or its editor, and CEOs route around editors. They also changed how they talk about risk. Instead of presenting risk as the reason to slow down, they folded it into the recommendation. The data is not ready for that use case, so here is the use case where it is ready, and here is what we do in parallel to unlock the first one. That framing keeps the CIO inside the conversation as the person making AI happen responsibly, rather than the person standing outside it explaining why it is hard. Same expertise, opposite effect on whether the CEO keeps coming back. None of this is about pushing the data leaders and specialists out. The strongest CIOs I know pulled those people closer and brought them into the room under their own framing, so that when the CEO wanted the specialist’s input, it arrived through the CIO rather than around them. They made themselves the orchestrator of the AI conversation instead of one of its casualties. If you are a technology leader right now, the question worth sitting with is not whether you are good at AI. You probably are. The question is whether the most important AI conversations in your company are still starting with you, or whether you have quietly become the person they get handed to after the thinking is done. That answer is set in rooms you may not be in, and the only way to find out is to ask who your CEO called the last three times AI came up. If the answer is not you, the role is still yours. The conversation has already started leaving. This article is published as part of the Foundry Expert Contributor Network. Want to join?
- Context Engineering Isn’t Enough — A Loop Engineering Experiment With No LLM Inside the Loop
Everyone is talking about loop engineering, but most discussions assume an LLM sits at the center of the loop. I wanted to isolate the architecture itself. So I built a deterministic, zero-dependency Python benchmark that replaces the model with simple rules, allowing me to measure one question directly: can a goal-directed controller isolate failures better than a traditional linear pipeline? After validating the benchmark across 300 random seeds—and fixing a subtle bug that initially invalidated my own results—I found that the controller consistently completed independent branches that a linear executor never reached. This article walks through the architecture, the benchmark design, the debugging process, and the evidence behind a narrow but practical claim: failure isolation is a measurable property of control flow, independent of LLM reasoning. The post Context Engineering Isn’t Enough — A Loop Engineering Experiment With No LLM Inside the Loop appeared first on Towards Data Science .
- Wall St Week Ahead Alphabet, Intel results in focus for AI trade as US earnings rev up
Wall St Week Ahead Alphabet, Intel results in focus for AI trade as US earnings rev up Reuters
- Japan’s Nikkei 225 Enters Correction on Fears AI Rally Overdone
Japan’s Nikkei 225 Stock Average tumbled to close more than 10% below its June 25 peak, a move termed as a technical correction, amid concerns the global artificial intelligence rally may be stretched.
- These D-FW jobs have the most AI exposure. How does your profession stack up?
These D-FW jobs have the most AI exposure. How does your profession stack up? Dallas News
- Khosla Ventures Backed upliance.ai Launches AI-Powered 12L Smart Oven
Smart appliances startup upliance.ai has launched a 12L Smart Air Fryer Oven, marking the startup’s expansion beyond its existing 5L…
Score: 32🌐 MovesJul 17, 2026https://inc42.com/buzz/khosla-ventures-backed-upliance-ai-launches-ai-powered-12l-smart-oven/ - From Virtual Agent to High-Performing Agent: The AI-Powered CX Shift Explained
From Virtual Agent to High-Performing Agent: The AI-Powered CX Shift Explained
- Chipmaker Kioxia’s Market Value Halves From Peak on AI Selloff
Japanese memory chipmaker Kioxia Holdings Corp.’s market capitalization halved in just a month since becoming the nation’s most valuable company, on growing concerns the AI-driven rally in the sector has gone too far.
- The sell-off for AI stars worsens, while oil prices keep jumping
The sell-off for AI stars worsens, while oil prices keep jumping Toronto Star
- North Texas data center firm valued at $3.2B after lukewarm stock market debut
North Texas data center firm valued at $3.2B after lukewarm stock market debut Dallas News
- Webair AI Turns Business Knowledge Into a Private Company Brain Accessible by Text
Webair AI Turns Business Knowledge Into a Private Company Brain Accessible by Text USA Today
- Marvell Brings Radix, Low Latency, And Bandwidth To Bear With Teralynx T100
Marvell Brings Radix, Low Latency, And Bandwidth To Bear With Teralynx T100
- EX DeFi Launches Its Latest AI Application, Enabling Wider Participation in the Digital Currency Ecosystem
EX DeFi Launches Its Latest AI Application, Enabling Wider Participation in the Digital Currency Ecosystem USA Today
- San Jose approves data center that would occupy big office building
San Jose approves data center that would occupy big office building The Mercury News
- Albo’s AI FOMO
Albo’s AI pitch woos Big Tech, creatives and voters, but startups need compute, datasets and gutsy rules in their favour.
- The Killer Robots Have an Eric Trump Problem
What's worse: the self-dealing or the development of death machines?
Score: 30🌐 MovesJul 17, 2026https://gizmodo.com/the-killer-robots-have-an-eric-trump-problem-2000787112 - AI Appreciation Day: Unlocking the True Potential of AI Begins with the Right Data
By Barry Norton Artificial intelligence is transforming industries at remarkable speed, helping organisations strengthen security, improve operations and make faster, better-informed decisions. Yet as AI becomes more deeply embedded in business and technology strategy, the conversation is shifting from simple adoption to measurable impact. On AI Appreciation Day, it is worth recognising that the real […] The post AI Appreciation Day: Unlocking the True Potential of AI Begins with the Right Data appeared first on CXOToday.com .
- It’s past time to end AI-based automated customer responses
An automated chatbot working for Anthropic this month shot down a Wiz researcher’s security hole report, saying that it “falls outside of the Claude Code threat model.” That was news to the security researchers at Wiz . It also turned out to be news to Anthropic execs, who had a very different view. In reality, Anthropic was one of many victims of the hole — including Amazon, Google and Cursor, among others . But what makes the incident so bizarre is that, far from dismissing the threat, Anthropic had detected it before the security researchers and had even patched it before the researchers alerted them. As these AI bots are wont to do, the bot didn’t merely reject the request. It confidently explained its rationale, even though its reasoning was wrong. “This falls outside our current threat model,” the chatbot said, according to a report by Wiz . “When the user first starts Claude Code in a directory, they must confirm that they trust the directory prior to starting the session. The scenario you describe involves a user explicitly confirming a permission prompt inside of a directory containing a malicious symlink, which falls outside of the Claude Code threat model.” That researchers said Anthropic management later clarified the situation: “The symlink warning in the Edit/Write permission dialog shipped in v2.1.32 (Feb 5, 2026), nine days before this report was submitted to us. It was added as part of proactive security hardening based on internal review. The decline to comment was an autoreply from our triage system.” An autoreply from our triage system? How many other make-believe replies did this system send? And what level of damage is Anthropic exposing itself to? This is not just an Anthropic issue. There have been numerous enterprise bot glitches in communications with customers. Some of my favorites include: Bots that chose on their own to cancel customers. (This actually was another Anthropic incident.) In this case, an Anthropic bot cancelled the AI account of a Swiss company that depended on the service. A lawyer got involved and the account was restored within a day — minus 80% of the data. Oops. A Cursor bot decided to log customers off when they switched devices, which it shouldn’t have done. The bot then emailed customers and lied that, “The logouts were expected behavior under a new login policy.” A Fortune story detailed how “the news spread rapidly in the developer community, leading to reports of users cancelling their subscriptions, while some complained about the lack of transparency. Cofounder Michael Truell finally posted on Reddit acknowledging the ‘incorrect response from a front-line AI support bot’ and said it was investigating a bug that logged users out. ‘Apologies about the confusion here,’ he wrote.” Voters in Scottish elections were tricked by government AI bots that “variously invented fictitious scandals, gave the wrong date for the election, claimed wrongly that voters in Scottish elections needed ID at polling stations and placed candidates in the wrong contests.” And let’s not forge the classic story about the Air Canada bot , where “Air Canada was ordered to compensate a customer after its chatbot gave incorrect information about the airline’s bereavement fare policy. The tribunal found that Air Canada was responsible for information provided through its website, including the chatbot.” Let’s be clear, here: Bots should be limited to relaying only pre-approved scripts. Generative AI allows for far greater chatbot sophistication, but that also means the chance of far greater errors. This is untenable in any business function. And when the app is pretending to be a human — and interacting with human customers — it’s even more unacceptable.
Score: 30🌐 MovesJul 17, 2026https://www.computerworld.com/article/4197481/its-past-time-to-end-ai-based-automated-customer-responses.html - Now on Dify Marketplace: Qubrid AI Brings Multi-Model Access to Every Dify Workflow
Install the Qubrid AI plugin on Dify to unlock unified access to DeepSeek, Kimi, Qwen, MiniMax, GLM, and more, all through one API key.
Score: 30🌐 MovesJul 17, 2026https://dify.ai/blog/now-on-dify-marketplace-qubrid-ai-brings-multi-model-access-to-every-dify-workflow - Pace Your Race and Win the AI Marathon
Pace Your Race and Win the AI Marathon Gartner
- 30 Entrepreneurs Write to WAIC: What China Expects From AI Development at the 2026 World AI Conference
From Zhipu AI to JD.com, Sugon to Insilico, 30 Chinese and global business leaders share expectations for China AI development at WAIC 2026.
- Replace Your Expensive Video Generation Software; Here Are 10 AI Open-Source Projects Anyone Should…
Higgsfield made a whole category of marketing work feel buyable: short-form video, polished product moments, fast creative iteration. The… Continue reading on Towards AI »
- One RAG Pipeline, Four Very Different PDFs: Same Four Bricks, Every Answer Typed and Cited
Enterprise Document Intelligence [Vol.1 #9B] - One call wires the four upgraded bricks together, run on a paper, a NIST standard, and a report with a broken TOC The post One RAG Pipeline, Four Very Different PDFs: Same Four Bricks, Every Answer Typed and Cited appeared first on Towards Data Science .
- Dividends are the best way to protect yourself from the AI bubble
Dividends are the best way to protect yourself from the AI bubble The Telegraph
Score: 30🌐 MovesJul 17, 2026https://www.telegraph.co.uk/business/2026/07/17/dividends-best-way-to-protect-yourself-from-ai-bubble/ - The Download: perimenopause misinformation and China’s latest AI leap
This is today’s edition of The Download, our weekday newsletter that provides a daily dose of what’s going on in the world of technology. There’s a lot of hype around perimenopause. Don’t buy it. Perimenopause used to be considered taboo, but not anymore. Thanks at least in part to TV doctors and social media influencers,…
Score: 30🌐 MovesJul 17, 2026https://www.technologyreview.com/2026/07/17/1140640/the-download-perimenopause-misinformation-china-moonshot-ai/ - AI hiring gains pace in Gulf, though most industries lag
AI-related duties, skills or tools were mentioned in 3.4% of professional vacancies advertised during the first half of 2026
- Mick Jagger has one rule for AI music: Make it your own
Mick Jagger has one rule for AI music: Make it your own Business Insider
Score: 29🌐 MovesJul 17, 2026https://www.businessinsider.com/mick-jagger-creative-people-use-ai-music-imitate-rolling-stones-2026-7 - Best AI Video Generators of 2026: Gemini Omni, Adobe Firefly and More Compared
AI video generators are not created equal. These are the best ones we've tested.
Score: 28🌐 MovesJul 17, 2026https://www.cnet.com/tech/services-and-software/best-ai-video-generators/ - The Token Mindset: Thinking in Context and Cost from Day One
What’s actually eating your AI budget and the code to measure it yourself. Tokens, context windows, and cost, explained with runnable code. Continue reading on Towards AI »
- In Her Own Words: Sarah Johansson is on the frontier of Legal AI
"Legal AI isn’t about shortcuts. It’s about sophistication, and for those willing to adapt, it’s the most exciting time to be in law."
- AI won't replace people, it'll replace the incurious, says Hostinger CMO Kristina Strimaite
AI won't replace people, it'll replace the incurious, says Hostinger CMO Kristina Strimaite YourStory.com
Score: 28🌐 MovesJul 17, 2026https://yourstory.com/2026/07/hostinger-cmo-kristina-strimaite-ai-replace-incurious - 16 AI prompt templates for better AI agent outputs
I've gone through a lot of painful trial and error with AI prompting—a lot. Which was fine when I was experimenting in back-and-forth conversations with AI chatbots, because I could refine my prompts with every response. But it's a different story with AI agents. A weak AI prompt baked into an agent's instructions produces the same bad output—and bills you for the same mistake—every single time it runs, with no one at the keyboard to catch it. I've rounded up 16 AI prompt templates that the Zap
- Viaim OpenNote review: I wore this open-ear voice recorder all day, and its AI meeting summaries proved invaluable
Open-ear design is more comfortable and social than standard earphones, but music is secondary to the AI feature set.
- Create an essay outline with AI: Tips, prompts, and more
Create an essay outline with AI: Tips, prompts, and more AI at Meta
Score: 28🌐 MovesJul 17, 2026https://ai.meta.com/learn/ai-for-students/how-to-use-ai-to-write-an-essay-outline/ - Operators and Fulfil Launch the Operators Portal: 4.7 Million Words of Real Ecommerce Strategy, Now AI-Searchable in Seconds
Operators and Fulfil Launch the Operators Portal: 4.7 Million Words of Real Ecommerce Strategy, Now AI-Searchable in Seconds USA Today
- Petula Clark, 93, Hopes Real Singers Will Survive The AI Tide
Petula Clark, 93, Hopes Real Singers Will Survive The AI Tide Barron's
Score: 28🌐 MovesJul 17, 2026https://www.barrons.com/news/petula-clark-93-hopes-real-singers-will-survive-the-ai-tide-faa2e54f - Psychologist Daniel Goleman Says AI Can Give You Answers, but Great Leaders Still Need This 1 Human Skill to Succeed
Don’t compete with AI. Lead where it can’t.
Score: 28🌐 MovesJul 17, 2026https://www.inc.com/marcel-schwantes/daniel-goleman-ai-skills-success/91375686 - UIUX Design with Gen AI Wireframing & Prototyping
UIUX Design with Gen AI Wireframing & Prototyping GovTech Digital Academy
Score: 27🌐 MovesJul 17, 2026https://www.thedigitalacademy.tech.gov.sg/course/detail/uiux-design-with-gen-ai-wireframing-prototyping - Meet the scaleup tackling AI's forgotten challenge: your camera roll
The AI industry has become obsessed with generating images, videos and text. But one London scaleup is tackling a different challenge: making sense of the enormous personal archives we've already crea...
Score: 27🌐 MovesJul 17, 2026https://tech.eu/2026/07/17/meet-the-startup-tackling-ais-forgotten-challenge-your-camera-roll/ - Alchemy Avenue Turns Marketing Into Measurable Growth with AI-Powered Full-Funnel Strategy in 2026
Alchemy Avenue Turns Marketing Into Measurable Growth with AI-Powered Full-Funnel Strategy in 2026 USA Today
- Role of IT services will not diminish but become more important in the AI age: Tech Mahindra Chairman
AI is no longer just a productivity tool at the edge of the enterprise, says Anand Mahindra
- AI will not diminish role of IT services: Tech Mahindra's Anand Mahindra
The Tech Mahindra chairman said AI will transform rather than replace IT services and called for India to build sovereign AI capabilities through trusted innovation
- AI receptionist use cases: How 8 industries never miss a call
AI receptionist use cases: How 8 industries never miss a call
- AI Essentials for User Experience Designers
AI Essentials for User Experience Designers GovTech Digital Academy
Score: 26🌐 MovesJul 17, 2026https://www.thedigitalacademy.tech.gov.sg/course/detail/ai-essentials-for-user-experience-designers