AI News Archive: July 17, 2026 — Part 10
Sourced from 500+ daily AI sources, scored by relevance.
- Meta Plans To Hire Former Top AWS Executive
Meta Plans To Hire Former Top AWS Executive The Information
Score: 15🌐 MovesJul 17, 2026https://www.theinformation.com/briefings/meta-plans-hire-top-aws-executive - Will Spain or Argentina win the World Cup? This AI tool has its say
Even AI is getting in on the World Cup excitement.
Score: 13🌐 MovesJul 17, 2026https://www.androidauthority.com/world-cup-prediction-new-ai-tool-roundup-3688374/ - Kling Alternatives
Exploring AI video tools that can replace Kling.
- Sora Alternatives 2026
Overview of AI video tools that can replace Sora in 2026.
- Roborock’s Big LiDAR Robotic Lawnmower Needs No Satellites
The RockMow X120H can handle up to a half-acre lawn in just a day.
Score: 12🌐 MovesJul 17, 2026https://gizmodo.com/roborocks-big-lidar-robotic-lawnmower-needs-no-satellites-2000787080 - Why OpenAI Is Selling a $70 ChatGPT Basketball
OpenAI’s $70 ChatGPT basketball and premium merchandise test whether the AI company can transform its software platform into a lifestyle brand. The post Why OpenAI Is Selling a $70 ChatGPT Basketball appeared first on TechRepublic .
Score: 11🌐 MovesJul 17, 2026https://www.techrepublic.com/article/news-openai-chatgpt-basketball-merchandise/ - The Chat Control gambit: The EU's 'undemocratic' revival of chat scanning may have long term consequences for digital privacy
Temporary CSAM chat scanning got the green light in Europe, three months after Parliament voted it down. Opponents now warn it could pave the way for lasting legislation that's unfit to protect our privacy.
- This AI-generated map of Austin is hilariously wrong
This AI-generated map of Austin is hilariously wrong Austin American-Statesman
Score: 10🌐 MovesJul 17, 2026https://www.statesman.com/news/article/ai-generated-austin-map-errors-22346117.php - Weave Alternatives 2026
Review of AI video platforms that can serve as alternatives to Weave in 2026.
- Texas Tech to rename Jones Stadium in deal with AI company. What will stadium be called?
Texas Tech to rename Jones Stadium in deal with AI company. What will stadium be called? USA Today
- Professors Giovanni Beltrame and Glen Berseth of Mila (Canada) Visits RIKEN AIP (July 16, 2026)
On July 16, 2026, Professors Giovanni Beltrame and Glen Berseth from Mila (the Quebec Artificial Intelligence Institute) in Canada visited RIKEN AIP in Nihonbashi, Tokyo. During the visit, they exchanged views with Takayuki Osa, Team Direct
Score: 10🌐 MovesJul 17, 2026https://aip.riken.jp/news/professors-giovanni-beltrame-and-glen-berseth-of-mila-visits-riken-aip/?lang=en - Luma vs Seedance
Comparison of Luma and Seedance AI video platforms.
- I asked ChatGPT how to stay cool during a heat wave — these 9 tips actually worked
I asked ChatGPT how to stay cool during a heat wave — these 9 tips actually worked Tom's Guide
Score: 10🌐 MovesJul 17, 2026https://www.tomsguide.com/ai/i-asked-chatgpt-how-to-beat-the-heat-these-9-tips-actually-made-a-difference - Luma vs Weave
Analysis of Luma versus Weave AI video solutions.
- Seedance Alternatives
List of AI video platforms that can serve as alternatives to Seedance.
- AI agents are hitting the pageant stage
Samantha Smitte, 37, who worked at IBM for a decade, spent about $150 on AI agents to train for the Miss New York USA pageant next week, she told Semafor.
Score: 09🌐 MovesJul 17, 2026https://www.semafor.com/article/07/17/2026/ai-agents-are-hitting-the-pageant-stage - Robot lawn mower deal: This coupon knocks $700 off the Hookii Neomow X at Amazon
The Hookii Neomow X robot lawn mower is on sale at Amazon for $700 off, thanks to an on-page coupon. That's its best price ever.
- Improvements to Cursor in Slack
Updates to Slack integration for better collaboration and AI-powered features.
- AI predictions for Spain vs. Argentina World Cup final
AI predictions for Spain vs. Argentina World Cup final USA Today
- Can AI beat a goldfish at calling the World Cup?
As chatbots compete to forecast the tournament, an unlikely rival from a Toronto fish tank continues to outperform them.
Score: 07🌐 MovesJul 17, 2026https://restofworld.org/2026/world-cup-ai-prediction/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=feeds - All About AI
All About AI PCMag
- Guess on why rationality is not more popular (there are no pamphlets)
First of all I should note that this post is just a guess! I have not run any experiments or anything. But anyways my guess for why rationality is not more popular is that the current expositions are super long ! Yudkowsky's sequences are about length of the christian bible. CFAR's workshops are 4.5 days. I think something the length of a pamphlet that you could hand out to people would work better! Just as an example I had Claude Fable 5 write two pamphlets. They look pretty fine to me as is, to be honest, but I'm not suggesting we use these exact ones. This is just to demonstrate the length and style I'm thinking of! In particular note how it quickly gets to some useful call-to-actions (page 7 of a pamphlet, which have much shorter pages than books). Pamphlet for general audience THINK BETTER A Pocket Guide to Rationality PAGE 1 — COVER [Image: A simple, striking illustration of a human head in profile, with a lightbulb inside — but the lightbulb is drawn as a maze being solved, with a bright line tracing the correct path through it.] THINK BETTER Your brain is lying to you. Here's how to catch it. A 5-minute introduction to the art of rationality PAGE 2 — YOUR BRAIN HAS BUGS You are running 200,000-year-old software. Your brain evolved to keep you alive on the savanna — to spot predators, find food, and get along with your tribe. It did not evolve to evaluate medical studies, plan retirement savings, or figure out what's true on the internet. The result? Your brain takes shortcuts. Scientists call these cognitive biases , and everyone has them. A few examples: Confirmation bias: You notice evidence that supports what you already believe — and ignore evidence that doesn't. The sunk cost fallacy: You keep going with a bad plan because you've "already invested so much." Overconfidence: When people say they're "99% sure," they're wrong far more than 1% of the time. Here's the uncomfortable part: knowing about biases doesn't make you immune. Everyone reading this list thinks "yeah, other people totally do that." That's a bias too. PAGE 3 — THE MAP IS NOT THE TERRITORY [Image: A hand-drawn map next to an actual landscape, where the map clearly shows a bridge that doesn't exist in the real landscape.] Imagine navigating a city with a map. If your map is wrong, you don't get where you're going — no matter how much you like the map, no matter how long you've owned it, no matter how confident you feel. Your beliefs are a map of reality. Reality is the territory. Here's the key insight of rationality: What's true is already true. Believing something harder doesn't make it more real. If your beliefs are wrong, you want to know. A wrong belief feels exactly like a right one from the inside — comfortable, obvious, certain. The only way to tell the difference is to actually check the territory. Rationality is the skill of making your map match reality — especially when reality is inconvenient. PAGE 4 — BELIEFS SHOULD PAY RENT Ask yourself about any belief you hold: "What do I expect to see if this is true? What would I see if it were false?" If the answer is "I'd see the exact same things either way" — your belief isn't doing anything. It's a freeloader in your head. Real beliefs make predictions. Real beliefs can be wrong . That's not a weakness — that's what makes them useful. And here's a habit worth stealing: think in probabilities, not certainties. Instead of "I'm sure" or "no way," try "I'd say 80% likely." This does something magical: it lets you update . New evidence arrives, and instead of defending your position to the death, you just adjust the number. You're not "flip-flopping." You're learning . A person who never changes their mind isn't strong — they've just stopped paying attention. PAGE 5 — NOTICE WHEN YOU'RE CONFUSED [Image: A person looking at a puzzle piece that clearly doesn't fit the puzzle in front of them, with a thought bubble containing a question mark.] You know that feeling when something doesn't quite add up? A story that's a little too convenient? An explanation that almost makes sense? That feeling is precious. Don't smooth it over. Most people, when confused, quickly invent a story that makes the confusion go away. Rationalists train themselves to do the opposite: to stop and say, "Wait. Either this claim is false, or my model of the world is wrong. Which is it?" Confusion is a signal that you're about to learn something — if you don't kill it first. Related skill: notice when you're rationalizing. There's a difference between deciding based on reasons and deciding first, then hunting for reasons . They feel similar from the inside. One question that helps: "If this evidence pointed the other way, would I change my mind?" If the answer is no, the evidence was never the point. PAGE 6 — RATIONALITY IS ABOUT WINNING Let's clear something up. Rationality is not : ❌ Being cold and emotionless ❌ Winning arguments and dunking on people ❌ Sounding smart or using big words ❌ Never trusting your gut Rationality is systematically making better decisions — about your health, your money, your relationships, your life. Emotions are data. Intuitions are data. A rationalist uses everything available to figure out what's true and choose what works. If your "rationality" is making your life worse, it isn't rationality. The point isn't to seem reasonable. The point is to actually be right more often — and to actually achieve the things you care about. Truth-seeking isn't a personality trait. It's a practice . Which brings us to you. PAGE 7 — START TODAY: FIVE THINGS TO ACTUALLY DO Don't just nod along. Reading about exercise doesn't build muscle. Here is your workout: 1. Make a prediction this week. About anything — a game, the weather, whether your coworker will be late. Give it a percentage. Then check if you were right. 2. Ask "What would change my mind?" Pick one belief you hold strongly. Write down what evidence would convince you otherwise. If nothing could... sit with that. 3. Say "I was wrong" out loud. Next time you're wrong about something — even something tiny — admit it plainly, without excuses. It gets easier. It's a superpower. 4. Steelman someone you disagree with. Before arguing, state their position so well that they would say "yes, exactly." You can't honestly reject an idea you can't accurately describe. 5. When you feel confused, pause. Don't explain it away. Ask: "What's actually going on here?" PAGE 8 — BACK COVER [Image: The same lightbulb-maze from the cover, but now with the path fully traced and the bulb glowing.] You don't need permission to think clearly. You don't need a degree, a book, or a group. You need the honest question, asked over and over: "What do I actually know, and how do I know it?" Every time you catch a bias, update a belief, or admit a mistake, your map of the world gets a little more accurate — and your decisions get a little bit better. It compounds. Start now. Pick one belief you're sure about, and ask yourself: how would I know if I were wrong? That question is the whole practice. The rest is just doing it again tomorrow. "That which can be destroyed by the truth should be." Pamphlet for those who know high school algebra THINK BETTER A Field Guide to Upgrading Your Own Mind — PAGE 1 (COVER) — [Image: A stylized human head in profile, with the brain drawn as a machine full of gears — but one gear is visibly cracked. A hand holding a wrench reaches in to fix it.] THINK BETTER Your brain is the only tool you'll ever use for everything. Here's how to sharpen it. A five-minute introduction to rationality. — PAGE 2 — What Is Rationality? Rationality isn't about being cold, robotic, or "logical" in the Hollywood sense. It's two simple things: 1. Epistemic rationality: Holding beliefs that match reality. Believing things because they are true , not because they are comfortable, popular, or what you've always believed. 2. Instrumental rationality: Actually achieving your goals. Making decisions that get you what you want — better health, better relationships, better work — instead of decisions that merely feel right. Think of your beliefs as a map and the world as the territory. A map that doesn't match the territory gets you lost — no matter how much you love the map. Rationality is the art of drawing better maps. — PAGE 3 — The Bad News: Your Brain Ships With Bugs Your brain evolved to survive on the savanna, not to evaluate insurance policies, news headlines, or medical studies. Decades of psychology research show that everyone — including you, including us — runs on buggy software: Confirmation bias: You notice evidence that supports what you already believe and ignore evidence against it. Motivated reasoning: When you want something to be true, you ask " Can I believe this?" When you don't, you ask " Must I believe this?" Different standards, same brain. Overconfidence: When people say they're "99% sure," they're wrong far more than 1% of the time. The sunk cost fallacy: You keep pouring time and money into failing projects because you've already poured in time and money. [Image: A cartoon person confidently walking off a cliff while looking at a map that shows a bridge.] You can't delete these bugs. But you can learn to catch them running. — PAGE 4 — The Good News: Beliefs Can Be Measured Here's a mental upgrade you can install today: stop treating beliefs as true/false, and start treating them as probabilities. Instead of "I know I'm right," try "I'm about 80% confident." This isn't wishy-washy — it's precise . It forces you to ask: would I bet on this? At what odds? And when new evidence arrives, update. There's even a formula for it (you've seen it in stats class — Bayes' theorem): P(belief | evidence) = P(evidence | belief) × P(belief) / P(evidence) You don't need to compute it exactly. The lesson is in its shape: Evidence that's likely if you're right but unlikely if you're wrong should move you a lot. Evidence that's likely either way should move you barely at all. No evidence should move you to 0% or 100%. Certainty is a bug, not a feature. Ask yourself: "What would I expect to see if I were wrong?" If the answer is "exactly what I'm seeing," your evidence proves nothing. — PAGE 5 — Changing Your Mind Is a Skill (and a Victory) Here's the strange part: in our culture, changing your mind is treated as weakness. Flip-flopping. Losing the argument. This is exactly backwards. If you never change your mind, you never learn anything. Every time you update a belief to match the evidence, your map gets more accurate. That's not losing — that's the whole point . Two habits to build: Notice confusion. That tiny feeling of "huh, that's weird" when something doesn't quite fit? Don't smooth over it. Confusion means your map and the territory disagree — and the territory is always right. Ask: "What would change my mind?" If your answer is "nothing," you don't have a belief. You have an allegiance. A belief you can't test isn't knowledge — it's furniture. [Image: Two maps side by side. One is elegant and ornate but shows a road ending in a lake. The other is messy with eraser marks and corrections, but shows the actual bridge.] — PAGE 6 — The Toolbox: Five Techniques That Actually Work 1. The Outside View. Don't ask "how do I feel about my plan?" Ask "how do projects like this one usually turn out?" Your kitchen renovation will probably run over budget — not because you're bad at planning, but because almost all of them do. 2. Consider the opposite. Before finalizing a decision, spend two full minutes genuinely arguing the other side. Not a strawman — the strongest version of the case against you. 3. Make predictions. Write down what you expect to happen — with a probability — before you find out. It's the only honest scoreboard for your judgment. ("I knew it all along" doesn't count if you never wrote it down.) 4. The five-minute timer. Stuck on a problem? Set a timer and actually think about it for five minutes by the clock. Most people have never spent five uninterrupted minutes thinking about their biggest problem. Seriously. Try it. 5. Murphyjitsu. Before starting a plan, imagine it's six months later and the plan has failed. What went wrong? Now you know what to fix — in advance . — PAGE 7 — Your Assignment Starts Now Don't file this pamphlet under "interesting ideas." Rationality isn't something you read about — it's something you do . So do it. This week: ☐ Today: Pick one belief you hold strongly. Write down what evidence would change your mind. If you can't think of any, sit with that. ☐ Tomorrow: Make three predictions about your week, with probabilities. ("70% the meeting runs late.") Check them Sunday. Were your 70%s right about 70% of the time? ☐ This week: Catch yourself in one bias. Just one. Notice yourself dismissing an argument because of who said it, or defending a purchase because you already made it. You don't have to fix it. Just notice it, and say to yourself: "There it is." ☐ In your next disagreement: Before responding, restate the other person's view so well that they say "yes, exactly." Then respond. Watch what happens. [Image: A checklist on a clipboard, with the first box being checked by a pencil.] The goal isn't to be right. The goal is to become someone who gets righter over time. — PAGE 8 (BACK COVER) — Cut Out and Keep: The Pocket Rationalist [Image: A dashed "scissors" cut line surrounding the card below.] Before believing, ask: "What would I expect to see if this were false?" Before deciding, ask: "How do things like this usually go?" Before arguing, ask: "What would change my mind?" When surprised, say: "Huh — that's confusing. Good." When wrong, say: "I was wrong. My map just got better." Your brain is the only tool you will ever use to make every decision of your life. You just spent five minutes sharpening it. Don't stop. Discuss
Score: 05🌐 MovesJul 17, 2026https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/EmKX9zByQq62TTcDv/guess-on-why-rationality-is-not-more-popular-there-are-no - Elon Musk, Sam Altman, Dario Amodei, and other AI leaders as 'Mean Girls' characters
Elon Musk, Sam Altman, Dario Amodei, and other AI leaders as 'Mean Girls' characters Business Insider
Score: 05🌐 MovesJul 17, 2026https://www.businessinsider.com/elon-musk-sam-altman-ai-leaders-mean-girls-characters-2026-7 - China's open weight Kimi K3 model snaps at the heels of US labs
Moonshot AI's latest open weights model shows a massive step up in size and performance.
Score: 00🤖 ModelsJul 17, 2026https://www.thestack.technology/kimi-k3-china-models-snapping-us-heels/ - Slumping AI stocks drag down markets around the world
Slumping AI stocks drag down markets around the world Austin American-Statesman
Score: 00🌐 MovesJul 17, 2026https://www.statesman.com/news/world/article/asian-shares-mostly-decline-with-south-korea-s-22347321.php - Chinese AI model takes US tech industry by surprise with abilities rivaling Claude and ChatGPT
Chinese AI model takes US tech industry by surprise with abilities rivaling Claude and ChatGPT AP News
Score: 00🌐 MovesJul 17, 2026https://apnews.com/article/kimi-k3-china-ai-0d8a5e268deb11a673f4d444fc597cc5 - Decide brings its AI spreadsheet agent to Cafe One
Decide is partnering with Cafe One to bring its AI spreadsheet agent to members, marking the first rollout of its new workplace distribution strategy.
- Asian shares sink, with Tokyo down more than 5% as slumping AI stocks drag world markets lower
Asian shares sink, with Tokyo down more than 5% as slumping AI stocks drag world markets lower Austin American-Statesman
Score: 00🌐 MovesJul 17, 2026https://www.statesman.com/news/world/article/asian-shares-sink-with-tokyo-down-nearly-5-as-22348910.php - Decide targets workplaces with enterprise AI rollout through CafeOne
Decide has launched Decide for Work and partnered with CafeOne to provide spreadsheet analysis AI tools for members with active subscriptions.
Score: 00🌐 MovesJul 17, 2026https://techcabal.com/2026/07/17/decide-targets-workplaces-with-enterprise-ai-rollout-through-cafeone/ - Kioxia dives 16% as AI stocks face deleveraging
Kioxia dives 16% as AI stocks face deleveraging Nikkei Asia
Score: 00🌐 MovesJul 17, 2026https://asia.nikkei.com/business/markets/kioxia-dives-16-as-ai-stocks-face-deleveraging - Japanese stocks plunge as AI deleverage sends Kioxia down 16%
Japanese stocks plunge as AI deleverage sends Kioxia down 16% Nikkei Asia
Score: 00🌐 MovesJul 17, 2026https://asia.nikkei.com/business/markets/japanese-stocks-plunge-as-ai-deleverage-sends-kioxia-down-16 - Sr Software Engineer (Python + Agentic AI) in Gurgaon, Haryāna, India
Sr Software Engineer (Python + Agentic AI) in Gurgaon, Haryāna, India Gartner Careers
Score: 00🌐 MovesJul 17, 2026https://jobs.gartner.com/jobs/job/111599-sr-software-engineer-python-agentic-ai/ - Amazon’s Zoox recalls 105 robotaxis after one drove into heavy smoke at an active fire scene
Amazon’s Zoox voluntarily recalled software in 105 of its robotaxis after an unoccupied vehicle drove into heavy smoke at an active emergency fire scene in Las Vegas on June 20. The smoke obscured the scene, which had not been cordoned off with cones. The vehicle entered, braked hard while attempting to steer away, and came […] This story continues at The Next Web
- Zoox recalls self-driving cars because they may not detect smoke
Last week, the top U.S. auto safety official said self-driving car companies must quickly address a "clear pattern" of driverless vehicles interfering with law enforcement and other first responders.
- CartHappy
Splits your grocery cart across stores, automatically
- Zoox is recalling its entire robotaxi fleet after one drove into a smoke-filled fire scene
The Amazon-owned company issued a software update after a vehicle entered an active emergency scene obscured by heavy smoke in Las Vegas on June 20
- Zoox issues software recall after a robotaxi got confused by heavy smoke
The recall comes as the top automotive safety regulator in the U.S. has warned AV companies about their vehicles interfering with first responders.
- Apple’s plot to crush OpenAI
Apple is suing OpenAI. The complaint is readable and intense, as these things often are, though many experts seem to think many of the allegations are just the ways things are done. So what does Apple really want here, and why is it picking such a public fight with OpenAI? On this episode of The […]
- Apple vs. Open AI Explained: The Battle for AI Gadgets Begins With a Juicy Lawsuit
Ah, so that's why we didn't hear about ChatGPT at WWDC this year.
- Apple vs. OpenAI: These Lawsuit Details Are Wild video
Apple sued OpenAI, accusing the company of stealing its trade secrets. But what now? CNET's Bridget Carey breaks down what to expect next -- and how it might impact OpenAI's hardware plans.
- The Apple vs. OpenAI legal showdown
The Apple vs. OpenAI legal showdown marketplace.org
- Apple sends legal letters to dozens of OpenAI defectors, report says
Apple appears to believe that additional former employees have shared company information with OpenAI.
- What’s next in Apple’s legal battle with OpenAI
Apple's lawsuit against OpenAI is just getting started. Here's what could happen next and what it means for OpenAI's hardware ambitions.
- Apple targets OpenAI workers over trade secrets theft lawsuit
The iPhone maker has accused OpenAI of stealing hardware secrets via its former employees. Read more: Apple targets OpenAI workers over trade secrets theft lawsuit
- Apple widens OpenAI trade secrets fight with preservation orders
Dozens of former Apple employees now working at OpenAI have been put on notice after Apple reportedly sent legal letters ordering them to preserve documents and communications relevant to its trade secrets lawsuit against OpenAI. The Financial Times reports that “around 40” employees have been targeted with these letters, which repeat Apple’s claim that its confidential information might have been exfiltrated, alleging “trade secret misappropriation and breach of contract.” The letters also require them to arrange to meet with Apple’s lawyers. The underlying lawsuit This comes on the heels of Apple’s explosive lawsuit against OpenAI in which Apple accused the AI company (and former Apple Vice President Tang Tan) of extensive coordinated data theft. Tan was at Apple for 24 years and is now Chief Hardware Officer at OpenAI. Apple’s lawsuit is defined by claims OpenAI took a range of steps to pry confidential Apple data from existing Apple employees, including using information such as internal project code names, to gain even more knowledge during interviews. The company says the evidence it has presented so far is only the “tip of the iceberg” concerning OpenAI’s approach. The lawsuit requests that OpenAI be prevented from using any Apple information during the development of its hardware. Apple is also seeking damages and suing two former employees for breach of contract for violating their employment agreements. The letters are significant. They represent formal directives that require former Apple staff to preserve documents, messages, emails, and other communications that could be relevant to the case. The demand reflects Apple’s belief that the alleged misuse of confidential information could be more widespread across the competing company. What’s critical is that orders of this kind override any standard data destruction policy and deletion of the requested information becomes a legal offense. Why this matters beyond the protagonists In making its move, Apple shows this is not a dispute about just one or two hires, but an attempt to constrain the movement of intellectual property between the two firms. With AI hardware emerging as the next major battleground in tech, the case could become a defining one; whatever resolution is eventually reached could define the extent to which former employees can carry experience and knowledge between competing firms. The case might also define what the line is between experience and knowledge and the sharing of trade secrets. This is important, because modern hardware development relies on far more than just finished designs . Product design leans into supplier relationships, manufacturing assumptions, physics, extensive prototyping, and product-roadmap priorities. If courts treat those accumulated insights as protectable secrets, hiring between major technology companies could become far more legally sensitive. The Jony Ive question The case comes as Apple prepares to combat OpenAI in hardware . Its competitor is now working with legendary former Apple designer Jony Ive . Ive is not named in the litigation, but Apple will be keen to find out whether confidential product knowledge, design processes, or supply-chain insights have travelled with former staff into OpenAI’s device work. Ultimately, for Apple, it’s about protecting its many blueprints for whatever hardware the company expects will come after the iPhone. For its part, OpenAI has refuted Apple’s lawsuit, arguing that it is “not aware of any evidence” that the lawsuit has merit. “We have no interest in other companies’ trade secrets,” said OpenAI spokesperson Drew Pusateri . “We remain focused on building innovative technology that empowers people everywhere.” The company’s lawyers also claim it did respond to Apple’s initial inquiries on the matter. What’s at stake The significance of Apple’s newly-shared communication preservation orders is that if discovery uncovers evidence supporting Apple’s claims, the case could complicate OpenAI’s hardware plans and create unwelcome scrutiny ahead of any future public offering. You can follow me on social media! Join me on BlueSky , LinkedIn , Mastodon and subscribe to The Core .
- Apple Sues OpenAI: The Injunction Threatening AI Hardware
By alleging that Tang Tan’s engineering division is structurally compromised, Apple is laying the legal groundwork to halt physical… Continue reading on Towards AI »
- How Apple’s big lawsuit could disrupt OpenAI’s IPO plans
Apple filed a trade secrets lawsuit against OpenAI last Friday, and it’s not messing around. The complaint alleges a pattern of misconduct reaching all the way up to OpenAI’s chief hardware officer and claims more than 400 former Apple employees now work at the company. OpenAI’s response so far has been carefully hedged, and the timing couldn’t be worse with the company reportedly eyeing an IPO […]
- Similo
Discover a company’s closest competitors
- Phrase
Your AI notes can edit themselves
- DeepSeek valued at $51.9b after funding
A person close to DeepSeek said the company had completed that financing round and had started a second one.