AI News Archive: June 1, 2026 — Part 19
Sourced from 500+ daily AI sources, scored by relevance.
- What's the Company Culture Like at Dropzone AI 2026?
What's the Company Culture Like at Dropzone AI 2026? Built In
- What's It Like to Work at Dropzone AI 2026?
What's It Like to Work at Dropzone AI 2026? Built In
- Dropzone AI Company Growth, Stability & Outlook 2026
Dropzone AI Company Growth, Stability & Outlook 2026 Built In
- What's the Work-Life Balance Like at Dropzone AI 2026?
What's the Work-Life Balance Like at Dropzone AI 2026? Built In
- MiniMax-M3 debuts, eclipsing GPT-5.5 and Gemini 3.1 Pro on key benchmark performance for just 5-10% of the cost
Big news in enterprise AI broke over the weekend as Chinese AI startup MiniMax released its highly anticipated M3 large language model on Sunday evening Eastern time, pairing frontier-tier coding and agentic performance with a 1-million-token context window and native multimodality for a fraction of the cost of leading proprietary models, with pricing starting at just $20 per month under its new subscription token plans. The company's leadership also announced plans to deliver the model under an open source license including "open weights," allowing for full enterprise downloading and customizability free-of-charge, coming sometime in the next 10 days. For now, it is available via the MiniMax API at a special discounted price of $0.3 per 1 million input tokens and $1.20 per million output tokens (on fresh cache) for the next week — beating proprietary U.S. giants like Google, OpenAI and Anthropic handily on cost, while also eclipsing the performance of the latest models from the former two on selected benchmarks. Even at its full price of $0.6/$2.40 per million input/output tokens, MiniMax-M3 remains at just 8-20% the cost of the leading, proprietary U.S. models. The traditional matrix governing large language model development has long dictated a rigid choice: software developers can either access top-tier closed-source intelligence behind restrictive APIs, or deploy nimble, cost-effective open models that falter on multi-step reasoning, dense coding tasks, and massive data sequences. MiniMax-M3 fundamentally upends this paradigm. By unifying these two historically separated frontier capabilities, M3 introduces a level of comprehensive utility previously restricted to expensive, closed-source ecosystems, effectively shifting the baseline of open-weights systems while drastically minimizing the operational compute footprint required to execute complex development loops. VentureBeat Frontier AI Model API Pricing Snapshot Model Input Output Total Cost Source MiMo-V2.5 Flash $0.10 $0.30 $0.40 Xiaomi MiMo deepseek-v4-flash $0.14 $0.28 $0.42 DeepSeek deepseek-v4-pro $0.435 $0.87 $1.305 DeepSeek MiniMax-M3 $0.30 $1.20 $1.50 (limited time only) MiniMax Gemini 3.1 Flash-Lite $0.25 $1.50 $1.75 Google MiMo-V2.5 $0.40 $2.00 $2.40 Xiaomi MiMo Grok 4.3 low context $1.25 $2.50 $3.75 xAI GLM-5 $1.00 $3.20 $4.20 Z.ai Kimi-K2.6 $0.95 $4.00 $4.95 Moonshot/Kimi GLM-5.1 $1.40 $4.40 $5.80 Z.ai Grok 4.3 high context $2.50 $5.00 $7.50 xAI Qwen3.7-Max $2.50 $7.50 $10.00 Alibaba Cloud Gemini 3.5 Flash $1.50 $9.00 $10.50 Google Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview ≤200K $2.00 $12.00 $14.00 Google GPT-5.4 $2.50 $15.00 $17.50 OpenAI Gemini 3.1 Pro Preview >200K $4.00 $18.00 $22.00 Google Claude Opus 4.8 $5.00 $25.00 $30.00 Anthropic GPT-5.5 $5.00 $30.00 $35.00 OpenAI New MiniMax Sparse Attention (MSA) technique helps keep the model's cost low At the core of the model's efficiency lies an architectural departure from classic Transformer networks. Standard attention mechanisms scale quadratically ($O(N^2)$) , meaning computational and financial costs explode as text inputs lengthen. To combat this "inherent flaw," the engineering team implements MiniMax Sparse Attention (MSA), a clean, extensible sparse attention blueprint. To visualize this innovation, think of traditional full attention as an editor reading an entire library from scratch every time they need to verify a single sentence. MSA acts as an intelligent indexing clerk , using a pre-filtering phase to partition Key-Value (KV) matrices into highly precise blocks. At the operator level, MSA uses a "KV outer gather Q" approach. The system treats KV blocks as an outer loop, dynamically aggregating only the specific queries that hit them. Because each data block is read exactly once and memory access remains strictly contiguous, hardware utilization skyrockets. In internal trials, MSA runs more than 4x faster than alternative open-source solutions like Flash-Sparse-Attention or flash-moba. When managing a maxed-out context length of 1 million tokens, M3’s per-token compute demand drops to just 1/20th of the previous generation model, translating into a 9x acceleration in the prefilling stage and a 15x boost during decoding. Rather than taking a pretrained text network and fusing it with a separate vision model, MiniMax engineered M3 as a natively multimodal system from "Step Zero". The company overhauled its data ingest machinery to blend naturally interleaved sequences of text, images, and visual components, scaling the total pretraining corpus beyond 100 trillion tokens. This deep data alignment enables the model to translate complex visual geometries, such as programming charts or coordinate maps, into structural code without losing contextual fidelity. On standardized assessments, M3 validates this engineering path. The model records a 59.0% on SWE-Bench Pro , an autonomous agent metric, positioning it ahead of closed models like GPT-5.5 and Gemini 3.1 Pro. It achieves a 66.0% on Terminal Bench 2.1, a 74.2% on MCP Atlas, and an 83.5 on BrowseComp—outstripping Claude Opus 4.7’s benchmark score of 79.3 in autonomous browsing and information retrieval. However, when contrasted with Anthropic's newly released, premium frontier model, Claude Opus 4.8, from last week, the competitive ceiling of M3's efficient sparse-attention footprint becomes evident across directly comparable, tool-intensive agent benchmarks. In the domain of pure code modification on SWE-Bench Pro, M3’s 59.0% score drops behind Opus 4.8’s leading 69.2% threshold. A similar performance delta manifests in automated system environments via Terminal-Bench 2.1; while M3’s 66.0% terminal execution score effectively runs neck-and-neck with the previous-generation Opus 4.7 baseline of 66.1%, it trails the upgraded Opus 4.8 architecture, which achieves 74.6%. Furthermore, evaluations tracking continuous GUI interaction on the OSWorld-Verified sandbox place M3’s automated computer use at 70.0%, compared to a higher 83.4% validation rate secured by Opus 4.8. These standardized evaluations illustrate the structural trade-offs currently defining the ecosystem: closed-source systems like Opus 4.8 maintain absolute margin leads on hyper-complex reasoning vectors, yet M3 delivers a highly capable baseline of local, tier-one automated operation without the compounding premium of closed-door API subscription fees. When positioned alongside the heavy-duty inference metrics of the newly minted, fellow open weights model DeepSeek-V4 Pro Max, M3 holds its ground across core agentic categories while asserting narrow advantages in specialized code synthesis. On the software engineering matrix of SWE-Bench Pro , M3's 59.0% resolution efficiency edges past DeepSeek-V4 Pro Max’s score of 55.4%. However, the competitive friction tightens in command-line environments; under Terminal Bench evaluations, DeepSeek-V4 Pro Max pulls slightly ahead with a 67.9% execution accuracy over M3’s 66.0% mark. In web orchestration and open-world browsing simulations, the two architectures reach a virtual statistical parity, with M3 registering an 83.5% on BrowseComp compared to DeepSeek's 83.4%. Similarly, on the MCP Atlas tool-use framework, M3 secures a narrow lead at 74.2% against DeepSeek’s 73.6%. This close alignment demonstrates that while DeepSeek handles a massive 1.6-trillion total parameter footprint with specialized high-effort reasoning modes, MiniMax's block-filtered sparse attention mechanism yields directly competitive execution efficiencies without requiring extensive parameter activation scaling. MiniMax Code AI agent offers Agentic Team capabilities MiniMax translates these architectural gains into immediate utility through an updated product suite divided between standalone applications, customizable subscription tiers, and raw developer infrastructure. For end-user orchestration, the flagship implementation is MiniMax Code , an AI agent product designed to maximize M3's multi-step capabilities. Operating via web or native desktop apps, MiniMax Code runs an "Agent Team" capable of breaking massive engineering tasks into multi-stage, concurrent workflows. The system relies on a "Producer + Verifier" adversarial harness loop. As one agent instance generates code, a secondary verifier instance aggressively tests and reflects upon execution outputs, allowing the network to self-correct and operate autonomously for days without human oversight. Because of its native visual grounding, MiniMax Code supports direct computer use. A developer can issue a cross-application voice prompt via their phone to have the model open a localized enterprise ERP client and batch-populate data tables directly from an open Excel spreadsheet. For custom setups, developers can pipeline M3 directly into existing workflows using an API key ( sk-cp ) compatible with common alternative IDE environments like Claude Code, Cursor, Roo Code, and Cline. The API introduces a toggleable "thinking mode". When enabled, M3 routes processing power into deep reasoning and long-horizon planning; when disabled, the model runs at minimal latency for quick text completion. The companion Token Plan models an aggressive pricing strategy structured around shared multimodal quotas. Billed annually, three options are available: Plus ($20/month) : Supplies ~1.7B tokens per month and handles 3–4 concurrent agents. Max ($50/month) : Supplies ~5.1B tokens per month, manages 4–5 concurrent agents, and adds 3 automated video clips per day via Hailuo 2.3. Ultra ($120/month) : Supplies ~9.8B tokens per month, facilitates 6–7 concurrent agents, and extends video capacity to 5 daily clips. Open weights makes M3 much more attractive for enterprise use MinMax's pledge to release M3 under an open-weights license model—with weights and technical documentation launching on HuggingFace and GitHub within 10 days—carries significant strategic weight for enterprise infrastructure managers. However, it is still to be determined precisely which license the weights will be available under, and whether or not it will be permissible for consumer usage, e.g. MIT, Apache 2.0 or the new OpenMDW license . If so, the calculus looks like this: Feature / Model Attribute Closed API Providers (e.g., GPT-5.5, Opus 4.7) Open-Weights Frontier (MiniMax M3) Data Privacy & Boundaries Requires external API requests; potential data ingestion vectors. Total local isolation; runs entirely inside private user clusters. Custom Optimization Limited to basic fine-tuning wrappers or prompt engineering. Full pipeline control; architecture allows deep adapter/weights customization. Cost Vector Consistency Bound to perpetual per-token API pricing models. Computational demands cut to 1/20th; mitigates hardware ceiling. By shipping the underlying model weights directly to the community, MiniMax departs from the closed-door approach favored by major American AI labs. For enterprise users bound by strict compliance and privacy rules, open weights mean they can run M3 locally on internal hardware. This setup completely removes the risk of data leakage associated with public APIs. Furthermore, it permits engineering teams to run bespoke fine-tuning passes, modify internal architectures, or embed specialized system prompts deep within the model layers—transforming an off-the-shelf system into a highly targeted proprietary asset. Initial community reactions are resoundingly positive The developer ecosystem reacted immediately to M3’s operational benchmarks, singling out its long-horizon autonomous behavior and cost-to-performance profile. A major focal point of discussion is a 12-hour automated verification test where M3 was tasked with reproducing an ICLR 2025 Outstanding Paper Award winner, titled "Learning Dynamics of LLM Finetuning" . As MiniMax's own researcher @MikaStars39 highlighted on X: "M3 ran autonomously for nearly 12 hours, producing 18 commits and 23 experimental figures on its own, and got the core experiments working: it matched the predicted probability trends in the SFT stage clearly observed the squeezing effect central to the DPO experiments validated the Extend mitigation method proposed in the original paper." Simultaneously, creators of developer tools highlighted the practical economic advantages of the model's new attention mechanism. The official team behind the agentic AI coding harness Cline posted an alert confirming day-one compatibility, stating: "The new MiniMax-M3 is their first model to have 1m context, multimodal, and agentic coding capability. Congratulations to @MiniMax_AI for the breakthrough in sparse-attention architecture cutting compute & cost to 1/20th their previous generation." This sharp drop in execution costs shifts how developers view the relationship between financial investment and capability. Tech commentator @jumperz mapped out this disruption, noting how M3 breaks a historical pattern in machine learning pricing: By addressing context scaling limitations through fundamental attention-level optimizations rather than brute-force hardware scaling, MiniMax has established a highly efficient open-source baseline. M3 demonstrates that the next phase of agent development will not just be driven by larger datasets, but by efficient architectural choices that make frontier-level performance accessible to the broader open-source community. For enterprises building autonomous software development or agent infrastructure, MiniMax M3 provides the ultimate "bang for the buck." While DeepSeek-V4 Pro holds a microscopic price advantage of $0.195 per million tokens, MiniMax M3 justifies its marginal premium by delivering superior autonomous software engineering resolution rates (59.0% SWE-Bench Pro). More importantly, because M3 is an open-weights model, the calculation extends far beyond the API chart. By deploying M3's weights locally inside private enterprise clouds, organizations completely bypass cloud data egress tracking, eliminate structural vendor lock-in, and can implement custom prefix-caching models on internal hardware. This technical approach transforms a highly efficient runtime budget into a permanent, privately owned corporate asset.
- China’s MiniMax Launches New Model as Open-Source AI Coding Battle Heats Up
China’s MiniMax Launches New Model as Open-Source AI Coding Battle Heats Up The Information
- MiniMax debuts AI model built for long and complex coding tasks
Chinese artificial intelligence start-up MiniMax has unveiled its latest flagship AI model, M3, designed to anchor the company’s push into coding agents and automated workflows. The Shanghai-based company said on Monday that the model’s redesigned architecture reduced computational requirements to as little as one-twentieth of previous levels, slashing inference costs while boosting response speeds. Notably, MiniMax said M3 could process up to 1 million tokens of data at once – five times more...
- MiniMax Launches M3 Model With 1M Context and Native Multimodal Capabilities
MiniMax released its M3 flagship model, claiming it as the first domestic AI model to combine frontier coding, agentic capabilities, 1M-token context windows, and native multimodal processing in a single architecture.
- MiniMax Releases MiniMax M3 with MSA Architecture Supporting 1M-Token Context, Native Multimodality, and Agentic Coding
MiniMax Releases MiniMax M3 with MSA Architecture Supporting 1M-Token Context, Native Multimodality, and Agentic Coding MarkTechPost
- eMoT: evolving Memory-of-Thought via Symbolic Anchoring and Memory Corrosion
While Large Language Models (LLMs) achieve impressive performance on multi-step reasoning tasks, their reliability is persistently hindered by critical limitations such as unconstrained hallucinations and poor numerical computation. Fundamentally, these issues arise because standard models treat rea...
- Explainable Data-driven Deep Reinforcement Learning Methods for Optimal Energy Management in Buildings
The increasing integration of renewable energy sources into power systems, particularly in buildings equipped with photovoltaic (PV) panels and energy storage systems, introduces significant complexity in energy systems. Volatile power generation, varying electricity tariffs, and increased entities,...
- Attention mechanisms and transfer learning for robust peach leaf damage classification under domain shift
Artificial intelligence provides a practical framework for crop damage assessment from imagery data, supporting early decision-making in agricultural management. In peach orchards, climate change increases abiotic stress and biotic pressures, including pests and diseases, which often produce visuall...
- RL-ACRGNet: Reinforcement Learning-Based Chest Radiology Report Generation Network
Medical imaging interpretation is a foundational pillar of modern clinical diagnostics, yet the manual generation of radiology reports remains a time-consuming process prone to interpretation inconsistencies. Within the field of medical AI, automating these descriptions through deep learning promise...
- OpenWebRL: Demystifying Online Multi-turn Reinforcement Learning for Visual Web Agents
Building capable visual web agents requires long-horizon reasoning, precise grounding, and robust interaction with dynamic real-world websites. Despite rapid progress, the strongest systems remain largely proprietary, while open agents still depend heavily on supervised post-training over large coll...
- Ranking vs. Assignment: The Metric Mismatch in Multi-View Object Association
Multi-view object association is an important computer vision problem that underlies many multi-camera perception tasks. While this task is naturally formulated as a constrained one-to-one matching problem, recent works heavily rely on pairwise ranking metrics like AP and FPR-95 for model evaluation...
- PlanarBench: Evaluating LLM Spatial Reasoning via Planar Graph Drawing
PlanarBench tests whether LLMs can draw planar graphs as ASCII art given only an edge list -- a spatial reasoning task that resists memorization because edge order, edge orientation, and node labels are all permutable. We evaluate 91 models on the 199 simplest non-isomorphic connected planar graph...
- Why Do Time Series Models Need Long Context Windows?
Modern deep learning models for forecasting groups of time series rely on increasingly longer observation windows. However, the benefit of increasing the window size is often simply attributed to capturing long-range dependencies, and broader discussion on how global forecasting models leverage inpu...
- MMG2Skill: Can Agents Distill In-the-Wild Guides into Self-Evolving Skills?
Abundant procedural knowledge on the Web holds great potential for helping agents solve long-horizon tasks. However, such knowledge is often multimodal, heterogeneous, noisy, and implicitly assumes human executors, making it difficult to use directly as the skills required by agents. To bridge the g...
- A Structured Benchmark for Text-Guided Anomaly Detection: When Language Stops Conditioning the Decision
Industrial anomaly detection has historically been a unimodal task. Recent multimodal vision-language models have produced systems that admit textual input alongside the image and are presented as enabling text-guided zero- and few-shot inspection. Yet these methods are evaluated with protocols inhe...
- SafeMCP: Proactive Power Regulation for LLM Agent Defense via Environment-Grounded Look-Ahead Reasoning
As Large Language Model (LLM) agents increasingly leverage the Model Context Protocol (MCP) to operate in complex environments, the expansion of their action spaces offers agents unsafe capabilities and underscores the risk of power-seeking. While broad action space and greater environment influence...
- An NLP-Driven Framework for Curriculum-Labor Market Alignment: Schema-Constrained LLM Extraction, ESCO-Anchored Semantic Matching, and Multi-Dimensional Gap Quantification
Schema-constrained information extraction from diverse educational and labor-market corpora remains an open challenge in natural language processing because existing pipelines rely primarily on lexical-surface methods that cannot recover implicit competencies, lack grounding in shared taxonomies, an...
- Algorithmic algorithm development with LLMs: A Case Study on LLM-Usage for Contraction Order Optimization in Tensor Networks
We consider LLM-based algorithm development through a case study on contractionorder optimisation for tensor networks with OpenEvolve. We pay particular attention to the choice of the LLM as well as design choices such as evaluation metric and test instances. Our results highlight both the promise o...
- AutoMedBench: Towards Medical AutoResearch with Agentic AI Models
Autonomous agents are increasingly expected to support end-to-end medical-AI research workflows, moving beyond isolated prediction tasks or short-form clinical question answering. However, existing medical agent benchmarks primarily evaluate final outputs, providing limited visibility into agent beh...
- Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning of Large Pretrained Models for Instance Segmentation Tasks
Research and applications in artificial intelligence have recently shifted with the rise of large pretrained models, which deliver state-of-the-art results across numerous tasks. However, the substantial increase in parameters introduces a need for parameter-efficient training strategies. Despite si...
- SMH-Bench: Benchmarking LLM Agents for Environment-Grounded Reasoning and Action in Smart Homes
Smart homes are evolving toward complex state-dependent living environments, requiring Large Language Models (LLMs) to reason over user intent, preferences, and multi-device interactions. However, existing smart-home benchmarks often focus on static instruction-to-API mapping or limited simulations,...
- Echo: A Joint-Embedding Predictive Architecture for Speaker Diarization and Speech Recognition in a Shared Latent Space
We present Echo, a proof-of-concept audio system built around a single 25 M-parameter ViT encoder. The encoder is pretrained with a JEPA objective and then specialised by stages to carry speaker identity, phonetic content, and dynamic source routing in the same 512-dimensional latent space, with no ...
- KliniskVestBERT: BERT Model Specialised to Norwegian Clinical Texts
The increasing application of Natural Language Processing (NLP) in healthcare demands language models specifically attuned to the complexities of clinical language. This work introduces KliniskVestBERT, a suite of three BERT-based encoder models pre-trained on a substantial corpus of real-world, de-...
- The Image Reconstruction Game: Drawing Common Ground Through Iterative Multimodal Dialogue
We introduce the Image Reconstruction Game, a fully automated benchmark in which a vision-language model issues corrective instructions to an image generator across multiple turns, making accumulated common ground directly observable as a rendered image. Benchmarking two Describer models crossed wit...
- Collaborative Space Object Detection with Multi-Satellite Viewpoints in LEO Constellations
With the growing number of satellites in low Earth orbit (LEO) constellations, the near-Earth space environment has become increasingly congested, making space object detection (SOD) a pressing challenge for space safety and sustainability. To mitigate collision risks and ensure the continuity of sp...
- Absorbing Complexity: An Interaction-Native Knowledge Harness for Financial LLM Agents
Financial AI agents often fail for a simple reason: they make users carry the complexity. A user must repeatedly restate goals, risk preferences, portfolio context, past judgments, and shifting market assumptions, while the agent answers, retrieves, acts, and forgets. In finance, this is not just in...
- WorldCoder-Bench: Benchmarking Physically Grounded 3D World Synthesis
Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly asked not only to write static interfaces, but to construct executable interactive worlds from natural language. Browser-native 3D, commonly built with Three.js, is a natural next frontier: generated programs must integrate assets, obey spatial and physi...
- RadioMaster: Multi-Agent System for Autonomous Radio Signal Generation
Translating user intents into physical radio signals represents the critical yet notoriously tedious final step in wireless prototyping, as it requires intricate knowledge of physical layer details and presents immense implementation challenges. Large Language Models (LLMs) and multi-agent systems h...
- Boosting Multimodal Federated Learning via Chained Modality Optimization
Multimodal Federated Learning (MMFL) enables privacy-preserving collaborative learning across decentralized clients with heterogeneous data and modality availability. However, most existing MMFL methods cast multimodal training as a joint optimization problem, overlooking a key bottleneck: modality ...
- Does Compression Preserve Uncertainty? A Unified Benchmark for Quantized and Sparse LLMs via Conformal Prediction
Model compression techniques such as quantization and pruning are widely used to reduce the deployment cost of large language models (LLMs), with existing evaluations focusing almost exclusively on accuracy preservation. However, in safety-critical applications, a model's ability to reliably quantif...
- Unveiling the Limits of Large Language Models in Inferring Pragmatic Meaning from Non-Verbal Responses
Although large language models (LLMs) have shown considerable progress in pragmatic language understanding, prior research has focused mainly on their comprehension of verbal behavior. Nonetheless, non-verbal behavior remains a fundamental component of human communication, especially when deliberate...
- LayerRoute: Input-Conditioned Adaptive Layer Skipping via LoRA Fine-Tuning for Agentic Language Models
Agentic language model systems alternate between two structurally distinct step types: structured tool calls (short, deterministic, low perplexity) and open-ended planning/reasoning steps (long, complex, high perplexity). Despite this heterogeneity, current inference systems apply identical compute ...
- CAPF: Guiding Search-Agent Rollouts with Credit-Attenuated Privileged Feedback
Recent LLM search agents use reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) to learn search-augmented reasoning from outcome rewards. On hard problems, these agents rarely sample end-to-end successful rollouts, leaving outcome-only RLVR with few positive-reward trajectories. We argue that imp...
- Dynamic Trust-Aware Sparse Communication Topology for LLM-Based Multi-Agent Consensus
Large language model-driven multi-agent systems enhance the reliability of complex reasoning tasks through multi-round deliberation, role specialization, and cross-validation. However, existing multi-agent debate and collaboration frameworks typically adopt fully connected communication, causing the...
- "I've Seen How This Goes": Characterizing Diversity via Progressive Conditional Surprise
Measuring the diversity of creative outputs is central to evaluating post-training mode collapse, comparing decoding strategies, and quantifying creative behavior in both AI and human writing. We propose a new approach to measuring diversity using in-context learning, of which the ``Decan'' metric, ...
- The Role of Ambiguity in Error Prediction via Uncertainty Quantification
The task of Error Prediction, namely predicting whether a model output is correct, is commonly tackled with Uncertainty Quantification (UQ). However, while uncertainty metrics capture when models lack knowledge or capacity to make a prediction, they also reflect aleatoric uncertainty, which is inher...
- LALE: Lightweight-Transformer Architecture for Land-Cover Estimation
Semantic segmentation of remote sensing imagery requires models that capture both global context and local detail under tight computational budgets. Prior work typically optimizes for one of these axes: attention for global context, convolution for local detail, or compactness for efficiency. While ...
- Agentic-J: An AI Agent for Biological Microscopy Image Analysis
Biological image analysis increasingly demands integration across heterogeneous tools, programming environments, and domain knowledge that few researchers can command simultaneously. We present Agentic-J, a containerised, multi-agent AI assistant, primarily for ImageJ/Fiji that enables biologists to...
- Fast and Lightweight Novel View Synthesis with Differentiable Multiplane Image
Recently, novel view synthesis has witnessed remarkable progress, with mainstream methods such as Neural Radiance Fields (NeRF) and 3D Gaussian Splatting (3DGS) delivering impressive results. However, these approaches often struggle to balance rendering speed and model size, and their optimization-b...
- Where Do Deep-Research Agents Go Wrong? Span-Level Error Localization in Agent Trajectories
Deep-research agents solve tasks through long trajectories of search, tool use, evidence inspection, and answer synthesis. Evaluation based on final answers shows whether an agent succeeds, but not which parts of the trajectory make the answer unreliable. We study span-level error localization for d...
- Extreme Low-Bit Inference in Reasoning Models: Failure Modes and Targeted Recovery
Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) rely on long reasoning traces, making inference expensive. While low-bit quantization reduces per-token decoding cost, we show that aggressive 2-bit inference can fail to deliver end-to-end speedup because instability in the generation process inflates total token count...
- Towards 3D-Aware Video Diffusion Models: Render-Free Human Motion Control with Mesh Tokenization
Diffusion models have shown remarkable success in video generation. However, whether such models are truly aware of the 3D structure underlying visual observations, rather than simply reproducing plausible 2D projections, remains an open question. In this work, we investigate this question through h...
- VET: A Framework for Analyzing AI Discourse
Public discourse on AI has become polarized; exaggerated positions on AI in traditional and social media threaten the development of AI Literacy among the general public. In this article, I introduce the VET Framework, a method for categorizing AI discourse along the dimensions of valence, effective...
- Bayesian Spectral Emotion Transition Discovery from Multi-Annotator Disagreement
Emotions evolve through the dynamics of conversation, and understanding their transition structure is foundational to applications ranging from mental-health screening to dialogue systems. However, existing studies typically compress multi-rater judgments into a single hard label by majority voting,...
- RA-LWLM: Retrieval-Augmented In-Context Localization with Wireless Foundation Models
Wireless localization is a fundamental capability of sixth-generation (6G) networks. Conventional model-based methods require accurate modeling of the propagation environment and degrade in complex multipath and non-line-of-sight scenarios, while learning-based methods couple model parameters tightl...
- QInsights
AI analysis for interviews and open-ended feedback